>> Actually, sometimes using let* instead of let (when defining several vars)
>> can result in more efficient byte-code.

> I thought they generally resulted in more or less the same bytecode, the
> only difference being whether the "varbind" byte-ops were interleaved
> with the init expressions, or all bunched up at the end...

Indeed, but the interleaving sometimes in turn allows some
further optimization.  It's all very minor in any case.


        Stefan


_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

Reply via email to