In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chong Yidong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >>> iso-8859-6 is an Arabic charset. Didn't the buffer contain >>> a character that can't be encoded by iso-8859-6? >>> > > > > The file has some Latin content in the header, and actually there is > > only one column of *real* Arabic (our "Latin" digits are indeed > > "Arabic"). Smultron is bad in showing wrong characters, GNU Emacs > > 23.0.0 does not seem to have ISO 8859-6 support. Re-opening the file > > I can see that in one spot a \233 gremlin is sitting, removing it and > > trying to save, I get again the question in mini-buffer! (I see > > exactly three Arabic glyphs, about 30 were destroyed by Unicode, and > > about 30 others are only showed in octal \xyz.) In the mode-lie -6: > > is active! > Is this bug still outstanding? I don't know. Peter has not yet answered to my question clearly. Does Latin in "the file has some Latin content" mean some character in iso-8859-1? --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
