Markus Triska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why would they care what it's value is though? I suspect it's just as >> common to simply check for the variable's existance, not its value. > > Yes, that's also common (at least those programs aren't broken by the > change). Other programs checking for "t": tcsh, Maude, zsh. For easy > optional backwards compatibility, what do you think about making the > new behaviour depend on a variable like "emacs-environment-variable" > with possible values 'path (use path; default) and t (old behaviour)?
I agree with this proposal. Should the default be 'path or t? _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
