In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Kenichi" == Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kenichi> They are ambiguous according to EastAsianWidth.txt of Kenichi> Unicode. I think the right thing is to set them to the Kenichi> symbol `ambiguous', and make display routine (and column Kenichi> calculation routine) to resolve it to 1 or 2 by checking a Kenichi> font (or a capability of terminal). In a case that such Kenichi> information is not available, perhaps, we should resolve Kenichi> according to the current locale. > Does the current locale influence the current font? The current locale influence the font selection in emacs-unicode-2. > Modulus that issue I agree that the above is exactly what > any app ought to do with the ambiguous-width chars. > (Another related -- and I presume mostly theoretical -- question > is what should be done when such a character is part of a combining > or variation sequence....) Difficult subject. :-( --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
