Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Another possibility is to switch to a different envvar name, but I > > think that would make an even bigger transient. > > I don't think it'll be much bigger. And it has the benefit of being > cleaner. > > Let's set another envvar now, and suggest that other programs switch > to it gradually. > > It could be called INSIDE_EMACS.
So, in the meantime, Emacs will set *two* envvars, EMACS and INSIDE_EMACS? That's really ugly. The transient *is* bigger for this suggestion. And its benefit would be to fix a bug that doesn't even exist! Is there even a single interactive program using the EMACS envvar that is run from a Makefile??? _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
