On 12/8/06, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I should be responsible for EmacsW32 I guess.
Yes, I think so. And this report is exactly the kind of thing some
people in the list were talking about: we're receiving a bug report
for a problem that it is perhaps non-existent in the official builds.
The unpatched version should really be the just the standard
distribution (from CVS) compiled + optionally the EmacsW32 files but
those should not be involved here at all.
As long as it is not the standard tarball or straight from the CVS, I
would count it as unofficial. Differences can creep in.
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
