On 12/29/06, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have already said I agreed.
Yes. My mind was wandering around, lost in the concept of awfulness,
and I got carried away. Sorry.
I have no intention of making my Emacs binary distribution be different
from Emacs default if I can avoid it.
Of course. But your threshold for deciding that it cannot be avoided
doesn't seem hard to reach.
The purpose of my binary distribution was (as I several times has said)
to make it more easy to get Emacs up and running on w32. I was surprised
that it was so difficult and time consuming.
Compiling Emacs on Windows can be time-consuming. Setting it up is not IMHO.
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
