Jan Djärv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > By using sigblock/sigunblock we make sure that counter isn't > touched, so it fixes this particular case. However, why the counter > gets the wrong value is still not known.
Can anyone even reproduce the bug other than me? If not, I'm more than happy to run any test cases you would like me to try. I've tried debugging it in various ways myself, but the timing seems to be so touchy that any attempt to observe what's going on changes things. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
