> PS: There was still a bug that I just fixed, which may explain what you > were seeing, although in my case it manifested itself by signalling an > error rather than silently ignoring the function name. Could be due to > local changes.
It looks good now. I think this last change must have fixed things for me. Thanks. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
