"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have just tested and it works as I think it should. The window is > refreshed between the two chained calls to popup-menu if I call > (redisplay t) before the second popup-menu. BTW Is this the way to do > it now instead of (sit-for 0)?
Yes. If you want to be sure the display is updated, (redisplay t) is the only way. > But unfortunately the other bug (menu title corruption in the second > popup-menu) is still there. I looked at this too, but I don't see anything obvious that can explain this. Can somebody see what's wrong? > This bug indeed looks a bit serious IMO. I have not been able to > reproduce it clearly before, but with the test code I sent I see it > every time. I see it too (on W32). > Another small problem seem to be that (sit-for n) still does not work > if I call it before the second popup-menu. Is that a bug? No. There is no guarantee that sit-for will update the display. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
