[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes: > ! (progn > ! ;; Since notionally this is a separate command, > ! ;; run all the hooks that would be run if it were > ! ;; executed separately.
Note that at this point this-command = last-command = nil. > ! (run-hooks 'post-command-hook) > ! (setq last-command this-command) > ! (setq this-original-command 'delete-region) > ! (setq this-command (or (command-remapping this-original-command) > ! this-original-command)) > ! (run-hooks 'pre-command-hook) > ! (call-interactively this-command)) What's the rationale behind the order POST, PRE, COMMAND? -- Johan Bockgård _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
