>> Yes, we can add some ad-hoc isearch hack in server.el for it.
>> It's kind of ugly, tho.
> No doubt. Having server.el forcefully exit from recursive edits and
> abort isearches is inellegant.
I don't think the behavior is inelegant (it's not great, but there's not
much we can do without major changes to Emacs). So I think the forceful
exit from recursive minibuffers is OK (it's generic), whereas the isearch
part is a complete hack.
> The alternative is for someone who knows isearch, recursive edits and
> event handling in deep to investigate the issue and propose a better
> fix :)
The better fix is "easy": implement concurrency in Emacs (at least the
cooperating form of it).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
