In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you. Could you give me a test case? I use "‐", but it has bold
> face even without the new fontset.c. So I can't see which bug it has
> fixed.
Ah, it depends on which font you have. By default,
emacs-unicode has these as fallback fonts (FAMILY
. REGISTRY):
(nil . "gb2312.1980")
(nil . "gbk-0")
(nil . "gb18030")
(nil . "jisx0208")
(nil . "ksc5601.1987")
(nil . "CNS11643.1992-1")
(nil . "CNS11643.1992-2")
(nil . "CNS11643.1992-3")
(nil . "CNS11643.1992-4")
(nil . "CNS11643.1992-5")
(nil . "CNS11643.1992-6")
(nil . "CNS11643.1992-7")
(nil . "big5")
(nil . "jisx0213.2000-1")
(nil . "jisx0213.2004-1")
(nil . "jisx0212"))
(nil . "iso10646-1")
("gnu-unifont" . "iso10646-1")
("mutt-clearlyu" . "iso10646-1")
The previous bug was that when you have gnu-unifont (which
has a glyph for "‐"), that font is used instead of bold
version of "DejaVu LGC Sans Mono". But, it seems that you
don't have gnu-unifont. If you have any of GB/JIS/KSC/BIG5
fonts, I think you can confirm that bug by the character
U+2190 (LEFTWARDS ARROW).
> I am still seeing square box for bold version of "─" with the new
> fontset.c.
Sorry, that is another bug which was not yet completely
fixed by the fontset.c I sent. I'm now working on it.
---
Kenichi Handa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
