Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The "19" should be "21" in the unicode branch. > > I'm not sure I understand what this magic number 19/21 is. Is there a > constant for it that could be substituted?
Yeah, though it's a grody implementation detail, certainly this ought to have a constant defined by the C code, if only to make the definition of make-glyph-code more clear (though hopefully people will use make-glyph-code instead!). > I'm surprised that that is the only change needed. The code points > between the unicode branch and Emacs 22 should be completely different, > shouldn't they? I assume most people get the codepoints themselves by loading a lisp file or something, which uses an external encoding. -Miles -- `Suppose Korea goes to the World Cup final against Japan and wins,' Moon said. `All the past could be forgiven.' [NYT] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
