YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:51:12 -0400, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> said: > >> After looking at it, I realized there was no need to call >> x_encode_text in the GTK case. So I separated the two cases >> completely, which should improve things. > > I'm not so familiar with GTK+, but is the call to XSetWMIconName > unnecessary in the GTK+ case? Previously, it was called in both cases > and that was the reason for x_encode_text in the GTK+ case.
I believe this was an oversight. However, on my Gnome desktop, it makes no observable difference. According to the Xlib specs, XSetWMIconName sets the WM_ICON_NAME window property, which is a "string that the client wants to be displayed in association with the window when it is iconified (for example, in an icon label)". However, I see the same iconfied window names for GTK and non-GTK builds, both before and after RMS's change. If we want to be safe, we can undo RMS's refactoring on the branch, going back to YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's patch plus an additional GCPRO for x_encode_text. In either case, we should be getting on with the release! _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
