* Emanuel Berg <in...@dataswamp.org> [2024-10-24 00:13]: > Jean Louis wrote: > > >> Sure, but we are allowed to discuss how to make > >> Elisp better? > >> > >> Since Python has had enormous success, and Lisp hasn't - or > >> if it had, it lost it - it might be a good ide to analyze > >> what they (Python) did good. > > > > Do you mean making Elisp better in the eyes of the world, or > > technically for Elisp users? > > How nice to hear from you, thanks for helping me out that > other time, so okay, this old and boring discussion tho - I'm > just gonna answer this one message - okay - ... - really, > ONE message, I saying. > > First, what I mean "better": as a programming language, > as technology.
I am here only to poke on you ;-) But I can't replace Emacs Lisp with something else. I have got interface and it is sufficient, I need not think of plethora of elements. We manage employees, documents, accounting, reports of all kinds, I mean it is huge. I have switched from Perl to Emacs. ** Statistics ╔════════════════════════╦════════╦══════════════════════════════╦═══════╗ ║ Total number of people ║ 242546 ║ Total Hyperdocuments ║ 62993 ║ ╠════════════════════════╬════════╬══════════════════════════════╬═══════╣ ║ People in last week ║ 108 ║ Hyperdocuments in last week ║ 216 ║ ╠════════════════════════╬════════╬══════════════════════════════╬═══════╣ ║ People in last month ║ 261 ║ Hyperdocuments in last month ║ 841 ║ ╚════════════════════════╩════════╩══════════════════════════════╩═══════╝ All that above is managed through Emacs interface. So if Python is better, it is for me personal issue, not technical issue. I have got no oversight and capacity to measure what is better. -- Jean --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
