On 5 Aug 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For some reason I get the impression you think that using SPC as your > auto-completion key is not optimal or desirable, which I find interesting, > given that it's the default in emacs. No?
This ia only partly true: ,----[ 4.3 Completion ] | For certain kinds of arguments, you can use "completion" to enter the argument | value. Completion means that you type part of the argument, then Emacs | visibly fills in the rest, or as much as can be determined from the part you | have typed. | | When completion is available, certain keys--<TAB>, <RET>, and <SPC>--are | rebound to complete the text present in the minibuffer into a longer string | that it stands for, by matching it against a set of "completion alternatives" | provided by the command reading the argument. `?' is defined to display a | list of possible completions of what you have inserted. `---- I think most people, including myself, tend to use TAB because it is similiar to Bash. Charles -- "Open Standards, Open Documents, and Open Source" -- Scott Bradner (Open Sources, 1999 O'Reilly and Associates)
pgpiiJhMyST3x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ emacs-wiki-discuss mailing list emacs-wiki-discuss@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-wiki-discuss
