At Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:47:04 +0100 (BST), Richard Fieldsend wrote: > The idea is to run a planner system on two different > systems (home and work) which I can use from both > locations, keeping track of my stuff I do wherever I > do it.
I do this at the moment. > > Currently I run two different instances, using a > ~/plans/ directory on my home machine and c:\plans\ on > my work machine. What I'd like to do is use the ftp > remote editing to place the plans at something like: > > /[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/plans/ > > The publishing directory would be on the same server > but located seperately. > > Problems that I can foresee: > > i. my home system is a Linux box, my work system a > Windows machine (not by choice!). Sharing the file > between the two might cause problems > > ii. ownership issues because of Windows broken > security model. > > So, has anyone tried it? Was it successful? I don't do it this way. I make sure that I don't use the two machines simultaneously and then I use unison (and multi-platform bi-directional file sync that works on windows and *nix) to keep things in sync. I make sure that I sync before and after using planner on my desktop and laptop. It actually works very well. I'm not too sure if line endings (CR vs. CR/LF) will be a problem as I don't use Windows - all my machines are Linux. I managed to drop windows about 10 months ago. > > For information I am using the Muse port of planner as > I also run a few other Muse 'projects', which are all > joined together in one publishing directory on my > remote server. I'm still on emacs-wiki. Does the muse port of planner work as well as the emacs-wiki based one? Cheers Alex _______________________________________________ emacs-wiki-discuss mailing list emacs-wiki-discuss@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-wiki-discuss
