>>>>> Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did a patch ever result from the following discussion? > Jim Ottaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>>> Sacha Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Jim Ottaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> I tried to make something like that work for the multi links, and >>>> it wasn't satisfactory at all. Perhaps it is best not to try to >>>> make implicit, or perhaps semi-implicit, links work in multi links >>>> after all. >> >>> Hmm. That could work. Multi-links tend to be programmatically >>> generated anyway. If planner-multi-read-name accepts a list of >>> implicit links and returns a list of explicit links, then things >>> should Just Work, and we can simplify the planner-multi test to just >>> check for the explicit link regexp. >> >>> Hey, you know, that would actually be simpler and safer... >> >> Yes, as I discovered, trying to keep the original type of each link >> gets complicated. And it's probably pointless as well: there is no >> real benefit for the extra cost. Not as far as I know. Modulo my quixotic attempt to allow mixtures of implicit and explicit links, there didn't seem to me to be enough information to know where to look for a bug. Regards, -- Jim Ottaway _______________________________________________ emacs-wiki-discuss mailing list emacs-wiki-discuss@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-wiki-discuss
