Phillip Lord <Phillip.Lord <at> newcastle.ac.uk> writes: > René wrote: > > Before using Planner I relied on a regular diary. > > What? Like a paper one, you mean?
No. I meant regular Emacs' diary. > > Now I've switched > > to planner-cyclic along with planner-appt in the "* Schedule" > > section, but I'm still confused about whether I am missing features > > that would be available if I were using regular diaries. I'm still wondering what would be the best approach : - working with planner-cyclic - or with planner-diary The second alternative seems to provide more features and the integration with calendar seems better. So I'm considering switching back to planner-diary. Does anyone have some additional viewpoint on this issue? Planner diary also seems to provide differentiated ways to deal with public vs. private appointments via planner-diary-private-file and planner-diary-public-file. BTW I would be great if spd.el (Select Planner Directory) could rely on this feature as soon as it is bundled into tarball/zipfile/debian package. Right now spd includes appointments from the planner-cyclic-diary-file into day pages regardless whether the day pages are from your private or public planner. -- René _______________________________________________ emacs-wiki-discuss mailing list emacs-wiki-discuss@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-wiki-discuss
