On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:21 AM, John C. Welch wrote: > > On 1/29/10 7:28 AM, "Ian Eiloart" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> If a writer uses bold and italic for emphasis, like I added to your >>> statement above, it's not your place to remove that and strip his text of >>> meaning and context. >> >> If a writer uses bold and italic for emphasis, then I won't see it. > > Yes, and then when you send it back, especially if that formatting had a > reason, it will look like plain text ass. Because nothing matters more than > PLAIN TEXT UBER ALLES > > Sometimes, the plain text people, a cult you sound like.
Now, I don't mean to sound snide or condescending or anything...but you *do* know that all your messages are sent as plain text, right, John? (FWIW, while I use plain-text 95% of the time, I think that supporting HTML in composing is a must, and a WYSIWYG editor is also a must for it, provided I can also check the source before I send...) Timothy Collett -- Rather than a beep Or a rude error message, These words: "File not found." ~haiku~
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
