On Jan 3, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > I hope that it would be possible to make the storage container backend > Storage Technology independent so that people like me who will detest SQL > until the heat death of the universe can use something else to store mail > messages. I would also recommend not depending on the file system because in > my experience, performance declined dramatically around 500 messages (ext3 > adn jfs). Even though I was using an SQL database (SQLite), it was > significantly faster using the database.
The standard library should probably have an API and one or two reference implementations. I think you can a file-system based implementation moderately non-horrible. :) -Barry _______________________________________________ Email-SIG mailing list Email-SIG@python.org Your options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/email-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
