Sorry to ask this here, since it is mostly off topic (lack of emailer 
support for IMAP is what made me give this some thought). There are some 
hotshot email people here, so I'm hoping someone can enlighten me. 
Responses should probably be offlist so we don't bug everyone.

What's the point of ISPs pushing for a switch to IMAP? I don't get it. 
Maybe I am missing a fundimental ability of IMAP or something, but from 
what I understood, I just don't see the point.

I thought IMAP was really intended to allow you to leave all your email 
on the server all the time. That sounds like a wonderful idea on the 
surface for the user. Now you can sit anywhere with an IMAP client, log 
in, and see all your email all the time. Kind of like WebMail but with a 
decent client front end.

That much I get... what I don't get is why ISPs seem to want people to 
move to it (and that's probably a bit agressive of a statement since I'm 
not sure how many ISPs have really attempted the switch, but it does seem 
to be a trend). If the intent is to leave email on the server, aren't 
ISPs just opening themselves to the headache of lots and lots of storage? 
I'm not one that keeps a ton of my email, in fact, I throw out probably 
90% + of it, and I still have a 70 MB or so mail database. If you figure 
something like Mac.com that offers IMAP and has a million users... well, 
the space requirements for even email tossers like myself is mind 
boggling. Not to mention all the people that keep everything (and I 
suspect keeping everything is more the norm just based on the people I 
know and how little they throw out).

Why would an ISP move towards a mail protocol that is just going to 
saturate them with storage costs? Unless they intend to stick to their 
current guns where they only allow 5-20 MB of email storage. Since many 
(most) people will want to save their email, or at least a chunk of it, 
they will constantly be downloading for offline storage anyway. So then 
you are back to POP like services, so then why bother making the IMAP 
switch in the first place?!?

And then we have the bandwidth issue. If the email is stored online, then 
everytime you want to reread an old email, you have to redownload it to a 
local cache for display. That naturally means FAR more bandwidth as 
people are constantly redownloading the same emails over and over 
again... why would an ISP want to do this to themselves?!?


So then all I can figure is I am missing some great advantage IMAP gives 
over POP. Any of you smart cookies want to enlighten me as to what makes 
IMAP so great?

-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>

___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  or  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to