Intel Fails to Meet Its Targets 

By LAURIE J. FLYNN

SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 17 - Intel, the world's largest chip maker, said 
slower sales of desktop computers and weaker prices led it to miss its 
revenue target for the fourth quarter, causing the stock to decline more 
than 9 percent in late trading on Tuesday. 

The disappointing earnings report made for a rocky start to the year, 
coming as Yahoo also missed targets on Tuesday, causing technology stocks 
to decline across the board. I.B.M.'s shares, however, managed to hold 
steady in after-hours trading, as that company reported solid profit 
growth for the quarter. [Page C6.]

Intel, a bellwether for the technology industries, reported revenue of 
$10.2 billion for the fourth quarter, up from $9.6 billion in the quarter 
in 2004, a 6 percent increase.

Revenue fell $200 million short of the low end of the company's own 
forecast, issued less than a month ago. Company executives insisted that 
December, which is traditionally strong for chip sales, was a weak end to 
an otherwise strong year for Intel. 

Andy D. Bryant, Intel's chief financial officer, said the sluggish sales 
in the quarter were the result of a shortage of chipsets, components that 
work with microprocessors. Some of the chipsets come from outside 
suppliers. He said "2005 was a great year punctuated by a difficult 
December." 

Intel has been facing intense competition from Advanced Micro Devices, 
which reports its fourth-quarter results Wednesday. Mr. Bryant said Intel 
had probably lost about a percentage point of market share in the fourth 
quarter. 

But Paul S. Otellini, Intel's chief executive, told analysts that he felt 
Intel would regain market share as the company ramped up its dual-core 
processor line this year.

"We will be able to retake share in 2006," Mr. Otellini said. "We're 
starting out in more of a hole than we had thought."

The company, based in Santa Clara, Calif., said the shortage of chipsets 
meant it was not able to sell as many desktop computer processors as 
expected. Intel executives also blamed the revenue shortfall on 
lower-than-expected prices.

Net profit was $2.45 billion, or 40 cents a share, for the quarter, up 16 
percent, compared with a profit of $2.12 billion, or 33 cents a share, in 
the period in 2004. Wall Street analysts had forecast that the company 
would earn 43 cents a share on sales of $10.56 billion, according to a 
survey by Thomson Financial.

The report drove Intel's shares down more than 9 percent in after-hours 
trading; they closed down 27 cents, or roughly 1 percent, at $25.52, at 
the close.

Further disappointing Wall Street, Intel executives said first-quarter 
revenue was likely to be lower than expected as well. The company 
forecast first-quarter revenue of $9.1 billion to $9.7 billion, below the 
Wall Street consensus estimate of $10.05 billion. 

On Tuesday, Intel was buoyed by a Merrill Lynch analyst report that 
warned that A.M.D. might not be able to maintain its growth in the face 
of Intel's arsenal of new products. Merrill Lynch downgraded A.M.D. stock 
from neutral to sell. In his report, Joe Osha wrote that the "Intel 
product road map should show improvement during 2006." 

Shares of A.M.D. fell $1.27, to close at $32.86. 

But negative news about A.M.D. did not alter Wall Street's concerns about 
Intel. 

Tim Luke, an analyst with Lehman Brothers, called Intel's guidance for 
the first quarter "disappointing," and he said it would lead investors to 
question whether Intel could stem the loss of market share as quickly as 
company executives would like. 

Intel's gross margin was 61.8 percent in the fourth quarter, below the 
company's expectation of 63 percent. The company said revenue in the Asia 
Pacific region was essentially flat from the third quarter, and that 
revenue in North and South America was down from the third quarter.

The company expects gross margin for the first quarter to reach 59 
percent. 

Intel's failure to meet expectations came as a surprise to investors on 
Tuesday because the company announced in December that it was narrowing 
its forecast to $10.4 billion to $10.6 billion, but did not lower the 
estimate. 

At the time, Mr. Bryant told investors that a shortage of chipsets had 
most likely caused A.M.D. to gain market share from Intel, but that Intel 
was benefiting from strong sales of notebook computers.

Because the quarterly report proved to be a surprise even to Intel, the 
company said it would no longer provide midquarter financial updates as 
it has long done.



_______________________________oOo______________________________
William D. Bandes     [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Zephyr Cove NV USA

___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  or  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to