*The Bogus ‘Joint Statement’ between President of Sri Lanka and Ban-Ki Moon*


 There is an underpinning effort made surreptitiously across the Panel of
Expert report to give the impression that the 3 member team was appointed
to ‘give effect to’ the joint statement made in 2009 between the Sri Lankan
President and the UN Secretary General. Firstly, the Panel’s report makes a
grave error in claiming that the UNSG arrived in Sri Lanka in 23 *March*
2009. The UNSG according to official records arrived in Sri Lanka on 23
*May* 2009. That was just 4 days after the LTTE was militarily defeated.
The next argument is how the Panel is taking pains to project that its
appointment had everything to do with a bogus joint statement that is being
promoted as the reason for its appointment.


*“**The Secretary General underlined the importance of an accountability
process for addressing violations of international humanitarian and human
rights law. The Government will take measures to address those grievances”*
(Nowhere does the Sri Lankan Government commit to undertaking an
investigation nor does the GOSL agree to an international investigation)


http://www.mea.gov.lk/index.php/component/content/article/1753-joint-statement-by-the-gosl-a-the-un-at-the-conclusion-of-un-secretary-generals-visit-to-sri-lanka



When taken word for word there is no such request made by the UNSG neither
is there a commitment by the GOSL to the UNSG that Sri Lanka would
undertake an investigation.


The implication is that the UNSG underlined the importance of an
accountability process and the GOSL replied it would take measures. The
vagueness of ‘those grievances’ leaves the doors open for people to assume
what they like but it does not confine to any particular grievance or
grievances or that Sri Lanka would carry out an investigation.

This being the statement jointly signed by the UNSG and the GOSL who is
attempting to fool Sri Lanka and the world by bogus statements made
throughout reports of an undertaking by the GOSL to an international
investigation and for the Panel of Experts to ensure that Sri Lanka is
fulfilling that assurance.



The following are the references to the Joint-Statement by the Darusman
panel

.   Introduction 3: “the establishment of the Panel of Experts is in the
follow-up by the Secretary-General to that joint statement”.

2. Introduction 4: “The Panel’s mandate is to advise the Secretary-General
on the implementation of the joint commitment with respect to the final
stages of the war”.



With a very clear non-commitment in the joint statement between the UNSG
and the Sri Lankan President, it is baffling how the Panel of Experts are
taking great pains to project that their appointment is connected to the
joint statement and their role is linked as a follow-up to ensuring Sri
Lanka is committed to the joint statement.


The next surprising element is how the Panel attempts showcase that the
Panel is the direct outcome of the UNSG’s statement “*The Secretary General
underlined the importance of an accountability process for addressing
violations of international humanitarian and human rights law”. and the
GOSL response “The Government will take measures to address those
grievances” *


If our understanding of English is correct ‘underlining the importance
of an accountability
process’ does not equate to ordering Sri Lanka to establish an accountability
process and the Government’s response that it ‘will take measures to address
those grievances’ does not equate to assuring such. Besides there is no time,
date mentioned.


Therefore, what mischief is the UNSG’s office upto in giving the impression
to claim that ‘at this time and against this background’ the Panel was
appointed. Moreover, let us also not that the LLRC was implemented in May
2010 so why would the UNSG go on to appoint his own Panel the following
month (June 2010) which goes to show that the UNSG has hardly given Sri
Lanka any time to run its own domestic process?


When the UNSG has every right to appoint committees to advise him
(without requiring
UNGeneral Assembly or UN Security Council) approval, why was there a need to
continuously establish a bogus link to the joint statement issued between
himself and the Sri Lankan President? Moreover why was that ‘ADVICE’ to him
given to the Sri Lankan Government and later leaked so that they could
cover up illegalities?


Moreover, with so many ongoing conflicts, why has the UNSG not used his
unforeseen budget to appoint other Panels to advise him on these ongoing
conflicts?


The references to the Joint Statements keeps haunting the entire report


*Formation of the Panel*


2. ‘*The purpose of the panel shall be to advise the Secretary General, on
the modalities, applicable international standards and comparative
experience relevant to the fulfillment of the joint statement to an
accountability process.’*


Was it not because there was some mischief that the UNSG has allocated an
‘unforeseen budget’ to fund the Panel?


*The overall task of the Panel*


7. *“The role of the Panel is to provide advice to the Secretary General on
the measures Sri Lanka has thus far taken and should, in the future take,
to give effect to the joint statement of 23 May 2009 between the Secretary
General and the President of Sri Lanka, with specific regard to
accountability, in the light of the actual nature and scope of all
allegations”.*  (the same reference in made in point 9)


12. *“The Terms of Reference require the Panel to advise the Secretary
General about the implementation of the joint statement regarding the
‘final stages of the war’.”* (why has the final stages been included in
inverted commas?) The Panel based its focus between September 2008 and May
2009.


The short and sweet of the argument is that that the LTTE was declared
defeated on 19th May 2009. The UNSG arrived in Sri Lanka on 23rd May 2009.
The same day a joint statement was released signed by the UNSG and the
President of Sri Lanka. Obviously, the draft of this communiqué would have
passed several hands and legal bodies of both the UN and the Sri Lankan
State but no one needs to have a formal English qualification to understand
that the joint statement that was released on 23rd May 2009 did not ask Sri
Lanka to carry out an accountability process and neither did the Sri Lankan
Government give assurance to carry out one. The UNSG ‘underlined the
importance of an accountability process’ this does not mean that the UNSG
demanded the Sri Lankan Government to carryout an accountability process
and it also does not mean that Sri Lanka gave any assurance with dates and
times when it would.


In May 2010, the Sri Lankan Government appointed the LLRC, the very next
month the UNSG appoints the Panel of Experts and these experts claim that
their appointment was to follow through on the joint statement and Sri
Lanka’s commitment to it. There was no commitment as is very clearly
evident and moreover the UNSG has shown no regard for Sri Lanka’s process
which started in May 2010 by going ahead and appointing his own Panel which
continuously makes wrong references to the joint statement.


The need to project the bogus nature of the appointment of the Panel, its
lack of credibility is important in view of the Panel of Expert report
being the foundation and basis for successive resolutions against Sri Lanka
and used by even the UN Human Rights outgoing head.


*“**The Secretary General underlined the importance of an accountability
process for addressing violations of international humanitarian and human
rights law. The Government will take measures to address those grievances”*
(Nowhere does the Sri Lankan Government commit to undertaking


So we need to once again ask, what is the mischief taking place?


Let us also note that in May 28, 2008 when the EU nations called for an
independent investigation of Sri Lanka that motion was rejected 29 to 12
with 6 abstentions. What has happened since and who are steering the
mischief?




*Shenali D Waduge*

-- 
තෙරුවන් සරණයි !
--
If You Unable to read SINHALA,
http://www.siyabas.lk/sinhala_how_to_install.html
==================================
E-MailSriLanka E-Mail Group
==================================
http://groups.google.com/group/emailsrilanka

මෙම පණිවිඩය ඔබට ලැබෙන්නේ ඔබගේ ඊමේල් ලිපිනය 
ඊමේල් ශ්‍රීලංකා හි සාමාජිකත්වය ලබා ඇති නිසාය.

ඊමේල් ශ්‍රීලංකා සමුහයෙන් ඉවත් වීම සදහා.
To UNSUBSCRIBE from this E-Mail Group, 
send email to : 
emailsrilanka+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
==================================
ඊමේල් ශ්‍රීලංකා සමූහයට ඇතුලත් වීම සදහා.
To SUBSCRIBE to this E-Mail Group, 

emailsrilanka+subscr...@googlegroups.com

OR Go to,
http://groups.google.lk/group/emailsrilanka/boxsubscribe
=================================
For Invite Members
ඊමේල් ශ්‍රීලංකා වෙත ඹබගේ යහලුවන්ගේ ඊමේල් ලිපින හදුන්වාදීම සදහා
http://groups.google.com/group/emailsrilanka/members_invite
............................
බුදු සසුන බැබලේවා !

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ඊමේල් ශ්‍රීලංකා" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to emailsrilanka+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to