Lenny, That should not be a problem. I would also recommend changing the Common PHY Header version to make it easier to spot conflicting message versions between patched and unpatched 0.8.1, should the situation ever occur.
See emane/include/emane/emanecommonphyheader.h: const static ACE_UINT16 COMMON_PHY_HEADER_VERSION = 0x0002; I would recommend bumping the version by 1 and setting the most significant bit high to indicate a local change. -- Steven Galgano Adjacent Link LLC On 11/26/2013 06:04 PM, Veytser, Leonid - 0665 - MITLL wrote: > Hi, > > I am implementing a MAC layer model than needs to support more than > MAX_NUM_FREQUENCY_INFO_ENTRIES of 255 as defined in the Universal PHY control > send and recv messages. Do you see me causing any potential issues if I > patched EMANE 0.8.1 to have the NumberOfFrequencies field be u16 and bumping > the MAX_NUM_FREQUENCY_INFO_ENTRIES to 512? > > Thanks, > > Lenny > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Leonid Veytser > MIT Lincoln Laboratory > Advanced Networking and Applications Group > (781)981-1395 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > emane-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://pf.itd.nrl.navy.mil/mailman/listinfo/emane-users > _______________________________________________ emane-users mailing list [email protected] http://pf.itd.nrl.navy.mil/mailman/listinfo/emane-users
