Maintaining the version number from the original code is important. I guess this is the nice thing about RPMs - it adds a release number after the version number for changes to the RPM which is what I've been using.
What about adding a field to the version number to signify EMBOSS version relationships? > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Rice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'Fernan Aguero'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [EMBOSS] EMBOSS 4.1.0 released > > > Ryan Golhar wrote: > > I agree. I was also expecting the version number on the > tarballs to > > change as well. At the moment, there is no way to tell they were > > updated... > > The embassy changes are all minor. We like to use the version > numbers of the > original code so it is a little difficult to merge in the > EMBOSS version ... > without making up a very long version number. > > Does anyone have strong preferences? > > Peter > _______________________________________________ EMBOSS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/emboss
