On 19/09/2012 11:58, Peter Cock wrote:
Does it need a new format name? EMBOSS already defines "ig" and "igstrict" - do the USPTO files diverge from these?
The format name is needed as an option to dbxflat -idformat so we can select a specific parser for any additional fields.
For example, in dbxfasta -idformat has 7 names for 'fasta' format. regards, Peter Rice EMBOSS Team _______________________________________________ EMBOSS mailing list EMBOSS@lists.open-bio.org http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/emboss
