Hi Gerald,
I am starting to abstract out some code that will be common between
different websites on the same server, and I would like to make this
code into an object which can then be inherited by the individual
websites. I would like to know if you think the following method is a
good way to do it:
The document base is /www/mysite/com/htdocs. The following paths are
absolute to the file system root, not the website root:
/www/common/doc.html
[!
# Bunch of Perl methods
sub execute
{
my ($self, $subs) = @_;
}
!]
[$ sub foo $]
[# Also some Embperl subs #]
[$ endsub $]
/www/common/subs.html
[!
# Some common subs
!]
/www/mysite/com/htdocs/base.html
[- $subs = Execute ({object => 'subs.html'}) -]
[- $object = Execute ({object => 'object.html'}) -]
[- $object->execute ($subs) -]
/www/mysite/com/htdocs/subdir/object.html
[! Execute ({isa => '/www/common/doc.html'}) !]
[!
# Redefine certain methods from doc.html
sub execute
{
my ($self, $subs) = @_;
$self->SUPER::execute($subs);
}
!]
/www/mysite/com/htdocs/subdir/subs.html
[! Execute ({isa => '/www/common/subs.html'}) !]
Does this architecture make sense? Also, is it ok to have Execute() call
a file which is outside the document base for the website?
Sorry if these are dumb questions, it's just that I would like to make
sure I have this right before undertaking a major overhaul of my code
(yet again...) to make it more object oriented and reusable...
Thanks in advance,
-Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]