>
> That would be much better. But it does introduce a new kind of tag
> that wraps around other tags. I don't know whether that would
> complicate your parser.
>
Embperl 2.0 parser can handle this with just a few lines more in the syntax
definition, I am not sure if I will introduce it in 1.3.x, because there you
are right it isn't such easy to implement
> I'd have to think about what that would mean in a wysiwyg or
> syntax-sensitive editor. I guess you'd just tell it to treat them as
> two separate tags--you wouldn't get balancing feedback, but it would
> leave them alone.
You can handle it as nested braces, then the editor could tell you if it is
correctly nested. At least the Embperl 2.0 parser will tell you if it is not
correctly nested.
Gerald
-------------------------------------------------------------
Gerald Richter ecos electronic communication services gmbh
Internetconnect * Webserver/-design/-datenbanken * Consulting
Post: Tulpenstrasse 5 D-55276 Dienheim b. Mainz
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +49 6133 925131
WWW: http://www.ecos.de Fax: +49 6133 925152
-------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
