-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 6:40 AM +0200 4/18/01, Gerald Richter wrote:
> >
>> At 9:50 AM +1000 4/18/01, Angus Lees wrote:
> > >"?[+ { %fdat, day => 1, month => 10, year => 2000 } +]"
>>
>> Neither of those techniques will handle duplicate entries, but they
>> definitely get me closer to a work-around. Thanks.
>
>What's Angus suggest above, is what I also would suggest to you. Why doesn't
>it handle duplicate entries ? The part between { and } is a Perl hash, so it
>will make sure every entry is unique. I think the above piece of code does
>exactly what you want (or I missunderstood your intention)
Two problems.
1. By duplicate entries, I mean will that expand a="foo\tbar" (which
is the result of ?a=foo&a=bar) appropriately?
2. I can't get that to work at all. It results in "?2000" when I do it.
- --
Kee Hinckley - Somewhere.Com, LLC
http://consulting.somewhere.com/consultants.html#kee
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOt20riZsPfdw+r2CEQL2/wCfUEb4niwdG1FUyO+513mxc4w9ZvAAn0z0
ZeYuc6LI1cZiPandqY22DA7v
=9Nnc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
