>You're suggesting that Embperl changes its syntax, affecting thousands
>of web pages (OK, so this is completely guessd :) ) simply because
>you could use a variable thats *deprecated* (ie will be completely
>removed in the near future) and you're having problems writing a
>syntax definition?
Is the phase 'backward compatibility" saying anything to you? I think no...
I didn`t think REAL substitution but extending the Embperl...
In that case it can solve my two problems... at least.
You can be sure Larry Wall WON`T ever remove $] from Perl because thousands
of scripts would be affected.
>a) Why did you send this email?
Because there are people who are not as good as you in Embperl. They can use
that deprecated form, why not.
>b) use Embperl 2 and write your own syntax if the current one bothers you.
But I want to give community the script. I`m not a vim programmer...
>c) mmm-mode and (x)emacs works just fine for me.
Congrats.
ps - please reply to mailing list
lzap
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
