Heyo, > You have posted you are running Linux 2.4.4 and Perl 5.6.0, right? Maybe it > could be an issue with Perl 5.6.0, but I cannot say that this is the reason.
Ayup, thats my setup. I will check it on my production server as well, as it has 5.6.1, a slightly different kernel -- and perhaps a slightly newer version of Apache. Give me a day or two on this one. > Does the make test of Embperl works correct (for offline and mod_perl mode)? It seems to, it goes through all the tests and prints out those nice little 'ok's ;-) > Do have compiled mod_perl staticly into Apache or do you load it as DSO? I will assume it is a DSO. I use the rpm version of Apache from a redhat distro (this is a RH6.2 base system). I was trying to stick with a stock system on the production, so I left it as it was. (maintenance is going to be handed off shortly). There were some comments about DSOs being unstable, but I figured they were perhaps old comments -- let me know if that is not the case. Either way, I can get the DSO to do what I want -- I just have to beat it a bit. ;-) > Could you try if it makes any difference, if you replace the PerlModule > Embperl, with Sure! > PerlRequire /path/to/startup.pl > and in startup.pl say > use Embperl ; > 1 ; I did exactly what you outlined (I only put the above in the startup.pl). I can send you the output if you want, but it looks to be identical (ie no configuration information). Well, at least it is deterministic! If you want, I can take my system and statically recompile a version of apache w/mod_perl. Couldn't do this until this weekend, however. Let me know if that would be helpful... Cameron <quick little german bit -- sorry to other readers> Wo genau is Dienheim? Leider bin ich nur eine blude Ami, das heisst das ich keine Ahnung ueber Geographie habe.... Entschuldigung. ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
