Thanks! It seems to be working perfectly fine so I'll just go with it!
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Donovan Allen wrote: > I have never had problems after doing the untie. > > My premise as to why this seems to be an ok thing to do is: > * If you modify the work around code to some sort of debug output everytime > $tie_stdin is defined, you will see that STDIN gets tied by mod_perl every > request. > * Also, my assumption is that the tied STDIN has already served its purpose for > the request by the time we get to the embperl scripts. This could be incorrect, > but I have not had anything break because of it. > > I am lazy, so as long as something isn't broken and seems to be working as > intended, I generally stop fiddling with it unless I am looking for trouble. > > It might be possible to create a protected copy of STDIN, but I did a quick > duplicate protection test and it seems that the duplicated handle is not tied, so > something is amiss and protecting tied filehandles may not be possible...then > laziness kicked in. :-) > > Ultimately, the mod_perl maintainers may be a better source for more details and > explanations, since they broke STDIN in the first place. > > Then again, if you ask me, the mod_perl maintainers should also do more or less > one of the following: > a> create their own duped STDIN to tie and mangle > b> fix the tie code to handle all the common downstream STDIN uses > c> or untie it if they are done with it so we don't have to guess, worry, and/or > dig around for answers to potentially harmless concerns. > > Cheers, > Donovan Allen > > Stefan Cars wrote: > > > Okey but shouldn't i tie it back some how ? > > > > /S > > > > On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Donovan Allen wrote: > > > > > Found this somewhere back when this bug first appeared in mod_perl: > > > > > > # work-around for mod_perl > > > my $tie_stdin = tied *STDIN; > > > untie *STDIN if $tie_stdin; > > > > > > # insert open2() or open3() statement after the above > > > > > > Gerald, > > > > > > It is a mod_perl bug, but I would consider putting it in the FAQ. Would > > > probably be very helpful to people. > > > > > > Gerald Richter wrote: > > > > > > Is there anyway to use IPC::Open3 or anything like it or is there another > > > module doing the same thing which can be used with embperl ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I don't know a solution. Maybe you can find something in the modperl > > > guide (perl.apache.org) or go ask on the modperl mailing list > > > > > > Gerald > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
