Kaare Rasmussen wrote: > What kind of bugs ? See thread titled "Re: Nested <DL> Bug in 2.0b9" started on July 2nd, continued on August 10th (Gerald said, in summary, that no progress on the bug had been made). This is when I suggested use of SourceForge for bug tracking.
Incidentally, I still think that 2.0 would be better if it was able to take existing 1.x code unchanged. This was already discussed, and Gerald asserted that 1.x code should work unchanged in 2.0. But (apparently due to bugs rather than design) this still isn't the case. See thread titled "Re: Testing 2.x with production 1.x code" from early July. Again, I haven't heard anything from Gerald on this since then. I have a lot of code, and I can't change it to break my production 1.x system until 2.x is more stable. If you're working with new code then this may not be a problem, but it's certainly a showstopper for me. Until I can get my existing 1.x sites working under 2.0b without having to make changes that break 1.x, I can't do real testing. I mean "real" as in real users hitting it on a daily basis - I'd love to be able to do this, if I could be able to roll back to 1.x until any bugs discovered are cleared up, at which point I could plug the new 2.0b back in and go again. /Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
