On Tuesday 30 March 2004 12:39 pm, Neal Gamradt wrote: > Hello All, > > I am looking into developing a new PostgreSQL database driven website. > Historically speaking I have used Apache 1.3 with mod_perl and EMBPerl 1.3. > I like to use FreeBSD as my OS of choice on web servers. EMBPerl 1.3 has > been rock solid stable and I have wanted to wait a good long time to make > sure that mod_perl and EMBPerl 2 are stable on Apache 2.0. Since EMBPerl 2 > is at BETA 11 I am wondering how confident people feel about using it in a > production environment? Is mod_perl for Apache 2.0 as stable as mod_perl > for Apache 1.3? I don't want to get way too far behind the times and I > also don't want to move to something that is much less stable than EMBPerl > 1.3. If people on the mailing list could give me their opinions it would be > greatly appreciated. Thanks! >
Hi Neal - I have been using Apache2/mod_per 2/Mason for about nine months on my personal web site, and for about six months on four web sites I administer. Very solid. I can not address the comparison between 1.x and 2.x because I have never used Apache 1.x nor mod_perl 1.x. I am new to Embperl, but have been using it for about two months on my personal web site. I wish it was totally thread safe so that I could use the worker MPM, but it works fine under prefork. I am using everthig 'beta' (CVS) on my personal web site with excellent results. My advice: they are ready-for-prime-time, go for it ;) Aloha => Beau; --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
