Re: Redefining common tags? (partial solution)

[RobertCZ]

Gerald Richter wrote: PS2 When I'm at it: <td> doesn't have to be closed and Embperl respects it and according to the HTML specs TR doesn't have to be closed too - can default Embperl be made more forgiving and ignore unclosed TR's? My hack just remove <tr> processing completely, that is hardly optimal I know that this is an issue, but I don't have any easy way to fix it. It's still in my mind and I hope I will come up with an good idea some day. Yes, of course - it's not a pressing issue - and people might go full XHTML after all, we'll see... BTW. <td> works because Embperl doesn't look at td at all Ah! I thought I saw somewhere in the docs about $row/$col variables and <tr>/<td> two-dimensional processing - I was too tired on that day I guess... ;-) - Robert