> > 
> > Yes, still failing. I hadn't noticed how long the @INC path was. I 
> > should probably take a closer look at that. Here's the 
> output from the 
> > test:
> > 
> 
 Ok, this is really only failing because of your long @INC 
 path and the way the lines are wrapped around. I don't have a 
 simple fix for this and since the test shows exactly the 
 correct result, I think we can leave it as it is for now.
 
 Gerald
 
 


 
** Virus checked by BB-5000 Mailfilter ** 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to