Hi,

Finaly I have put your patch into the Embperl code and verified that all other 
places where perl is called sets up the stack correctly.

I send you a patched version via private email and would be happy if you could 
run the make test to verify that I have done the right thing, before I release 
the next version.

Thanks

Gerald

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:52 PM
> To: 'Doug Rayner'; 'Embperl'
> Subject: RE: Build of V2.1.0 fails on FreeBSD V6.1
> 
> > 
> > Thanks for the quick reply.  I think I have actually found 
> a solution 
> > to the problem.  I think there is some required 
> housekeeping that was 
> > not done before the call to perl_call_pv.  I had add the 
> following two 
> > line before the call and it seems to have resolved the 
> problem.  Would 
> > you consider putting this into the next release?
> > 
> 
> Yes, this seems to make sense
> 
> Gerald
> 
> 
> 
> > {
> >     dSP;
> >     PUSHMARK(sp) ;
> >     perl_call_pv ("Embperl::PreLoadFiles", G_DISCARD) ; }
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks and regards,
> > 
> > Doug Rayner
> > Senior System Architect
> > Savicom: Next Generation eMail Marketing http://www.savicom.net
> > (415) 617-9006
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gerald Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Doug Rayner'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Embperl'" 
> > <embperl@perl.apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM
> > Subject: RE: Build of V2.1.0 fails on FreeBSD V6.1
> > 
> > 
> > >>
> > >> I have done some more research on this problem, and it 
> seems that 
> > >> this line in epinit.c (#973):
> > >>
> > >>     perl_call_pv ("Embperl::PreLoadFiles", G_DISCARD) ;
> > >>
> > >> Causes the problem.  If I comment it out, everything 
> seems to work.
> > >>
> > >> Gerald, if you are seeing this:  what is your opinion about why 
> > >> this might fail?  I took a look at the function 
> > >> Embperl::PreLoadFiles and it seems to be relevany only 
> if mod_perl 
> > >> is in play.  I am not using mod_perl.  Do you think it's safe to 
> > >> comment out this call permanently?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, it's safe to comment it out. You just loose the
> > ability to preload
> > > files during Apache startup, which you don't use if you don't use 
> > > mod_perl.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your research, I will try to find out what's
> > wrong with this
> > > function.
> > >
> > > Gerald
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ** Virus checked by BB-5000 Mailfilter **
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > ** Virus checked by BB-5000 Mailfilter ** 
> > !DSPAM:45466135107383067195541!
> > 
> 
> 
>  
> ** Virus checked by BB-5000 Mailfilter ** 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>  
> ** Virus checked by BB-5000 Mailfilter ** 
> !DSPAM:4546661a124401699110656!
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to