On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 04:45:02PM -0400, Kee Hinckley wrote: > WHAT I WANT TO KNOW > The question is very simple. Are other people interested in going in > this direction? If I put out an Embperl::Object View component for > Catalyst, is anyone going to use it? And if I start discussing how > we can grow and extend Embperl, is anyone going to answer back?
Well, I'm not looking at Catalyst; I have my own "home grown" framework which works and I'm not tempted to change it, since it is working. But I do like your "grow and extend" Embperl ideas. Embperl can be frustrating. It's wonderfully powerful, and I love Perl, and it can do heaps, but there *are* places where things don't "just work", and I've had to do workarounds. I also get the impression that Gerald is kind of running out of steam as far as developing Embperl goes. I know that I reported a bug in Embperl::Form::Validate last year, but there still hasn't been an official bug-fix release for that. (Yes, it's in SVN, but that doesn't help when one is installing things via CPAN) The fact that a lot of Embperl is written in C is an advantage and a disadvantage. An advantage because, of course, it makes it lovely and fast. A disadvantage because it makes it harder to understand (and therefore contribute to) the code. Kathryn Andersen -- _--_|\ | Kathryn Andersen <http://www.katspace.com> / \ | \_.--.*/ | GenFicCrit mailing list <http://www.katspace.com/gen_fic_crit/> v | ------------| Melbourne -> Victoria -> Australia -> Southern Hemisphere Maranatha! | -> Earth -> Sol -> Milky Way Galaxy -> Universe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
