Marcus Doemling wrote:
> I think one key improvement would be to turn mod_perl into
> mod_embperl ...
> so mod_perl by itself in not "useful"...
The idea is nice, though I'd rather see it as a deeper integration into
mod_perl.
mod_perl IS useful.
As an Embperl "end user" I use mod_perl for it's speed and it's
preloading of perl modules.
> ... people on this list I also have done a lot of investigation
> about other tools and Embperl to me is the clear winner ...
IMHO, this is quite true, as for other options I've tried : CGI is like
a slower php with less options, MASON is nice and flexible but not
"human readable", CATALYST is top notch with big framework but seems a
bit of a sledgehammer for small apps.
EMBPERL is clear and easy to maintain no matter the size of your apps.
Thanks again Mr Gerald Richter for pulling this up !
> So how about Embperl joining forces with the mod_perl people ...
Though my abyssimal knowledge of C won't be of any help ...
I plain agree and am eager to see it.
Regards.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
