I tested this a bit last night.   Very cool - nice work.

With a base_period of 30000 I was comfortably getting 420ipm with an input 
scale of 4000.  Without doublefreq - 30000 would have only give a maximum of 
250ipm.   Theoretically you should be able to approach almost 500ipm  (but 
you still need to set limits as in 'step on time' (reset-time))  I currently 
have it set to 2000(2us).

Read jeplers link to understand it better :)

here it is zipping around at 400+ipm 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxzTPXBbxXY  That was with the acceleration 
set a bit low - you can see it when it changes direction  I now have it set 
to 50inc/sec/sec.

again - nice work.

sam


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Epler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:05 AM
Subject: [Emc-developers] Double step rate in TRUNK


>I have just committed the "double step rate" changes to CVS TRUNK.
> You can read a detailed explanation of it on my blog:
>    http://axis.unpy.net/01188134101
> ini/hal changes are required to use this new feature.
>
> Jeff
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to