On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 13:26 +0300, Alex Joni wrote: > Hi all, > > I started a wiki page > http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Emc2PackagesRedesign > describing some vague ideas around redoing the emc2 packages. > So far it's only a description of some of the things I think would be > nice, not sure they can be all implemented. > > I am looking forward for other ideas, criticism, etc (the usual > stuff :). > > Regards, > Alex
Hi Alex Yea. Separate out docs during a build but keep them in place so we have proper versioning. Docs ought to have a language option so we are able to create specific language packages. IMO we screwed up putting the latest doc edits back into 2.2.6. We would not have done that for source. The sim stuff does seem like a conflict but I'm of the opinion that we should mimic the kernel build and allow the production of modules as we want rather than every possible setup. I know we've talked at length about this before. We should just bite the bullet, choose a system, and get it done. I wonder if we could create an on-line computer setup, a bit like the sourceforge compile farm that has all the dependencies met. Folk can submit a compile config to and get a run-in-place tarball back. Rayh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers