> I had intended to reply to this message, but I forgot. My apologies. > > I know there are users who have requested this behavior (even if people > who are used to having plenty of inputs have concerns about it), and for > the most part the patch looks good from a technical standpoint. > > The only question I had about the patch is that I am surprised it didn't > add ALL_LIMIT_HOME to exclusive[ALL_LIMIT] or exclusive[ALL_HOME]. Can > you tell me why, or send a new patch with this flaw corrected? I overlooked this. Mainly i searched for ALL_LIMITS and ALL_HOMES and modified code. There is correct version attached. Also there was missing 'setp' in line setting lut5.0.function, it's corrected now.
Petr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
