Currently G73 retracts by 0.010" to break chips (hard-coded as G83_RAPID_DELTA in interp_internal.hh) Shouldn't this cycle use the R parameter value? This query is a result of a forum post. I suspect that the real solution would be for the OP to fix the 0.010" flex in his machine, but I suspect that mine is just as bad when pushing big drills.
-- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
