On 25 April 2011 10:33, Jeff Epler <[email protected]> wrote: > Your change modifies the NAME token whereever it is used, for instance > when delcaring the name of a function:
I can see that being undesirable, unless it is a good idea to allow function pointers in comp. > Even in a 'variable' declaration, it allows things that don't make > sense, like > variable *9; undef/defining the value of "9" does seem unwise. > Does the alternative below work for you? It does, thankyou. I don't have the actual hardware that the driver is written for, but it compiles and tests out OK as far as I can go. I don't see any reason to believe it can't be pushed, the preprocessed C looks good. (apart from the initial declaration lines being double-spaced which seems irrelevant in transient code like that.) -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
