On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:56:21PM -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > Chris Radek wrote: > > If nothing else this will fool a timestamp based sub-period velocity > > estimate algorithm into giving you something crazy, which defeats > > our new pid features. > > Yes, bursting counts would ruin the timestamp velocity estimation. The > PPMC doesn't have this feature yet, only the UPC. I will have to work > on that, too.
If you really have 65K-1M per rev, though, dP/dt is going to give you a better than usual velocity estimate. If your hardware can measure the real dt instead of the driver trusting the pc latency to be negligible, even better? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
