My suggestion for asciidoc is to use Mathjax.

There are straigfordward instructions at this thread:

http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc/browse_thread/thread/4a80346a5f4bb728

In particular read the answer from David E. Miller on 29th of June.

Formulas are of excellen quality, they are rendered they are not
bitmaps!!!, so the y are scalable...

Have a nice day,

Javier

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, John Prentice
<j...@castlewd.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Morley" <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com>
>
> <snip>
>>
>> And really I think the HAL file should be made smaller and be about basic
>> use of
>> HAL and a few of it's tricks for diagnosing problems.
>>
>> Chris M
>> The rest of HAL belongs in the integrators manual as HAL is mostly what an
>> integrator has to deal with.
>>
>  As a relatively new "user" I endorse those suggestions. I would look to the
> Integrator's Manual (System Integrator's manual might be a better title for
> this) for definitions of components and the running of .hal files from the
> configuration etc. The HAL manual would give the philosophy, the syntax and
> semantics of commands and the documentation of the tools ('meter, 'scope and
> comp).
>
> IMO some revision of the core HAL text is needed.
>
> (a) The introduction still has overtones of the discussions justifying
> having a HAL.
>
> (b) There is a lot on the syntax of names but no reference material on using
> them. For example I have found defining a net on one line to be the most
> readable way of wiring a few pins
>
> net foo-enable.0  panel.0.enable => drive.0.enable drive.1.enable
> drive.2.enable
>
> This possibility is not documented in the 2.4 manual as far as I know.
>
> (c) I think there should be some guidance for component writers on the use
> of parameters versus pins. For example the gains in PID are parameters but
> they are defined in such a way that one cannot connect them to "tuning
> scale" controls on a VCP.  In my ignorance I do not actually see the need
> for the two concepts - but that is another matter.
>
> John Prentice
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
> What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
> from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
> provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
> virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop 
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to