Kim Kirwan wrote: > With 12.04 and 2.5 waiting in the wings, and with new UI's > and similar such as GladeVCP, ngcgui, etc., not to mention > the disappearance of 4:3 displays in favor of 16:9 or 16:10, > I would like to pose a question for the developers: > > How long will 1024x780 remain a viable screen resolution > for LinuxCNC? (I mean before it becomes too "inconvenient", > as 800x600 has become already, in my opinion.) Or is it > already past that? Is 1280x1024 now the practical minimum? > > (Considering purchasing a 1024x780 touch screen or two.) > > I am asking here only about "things that fill up the screen", > not the problem of new vs. old video connectors/cards. > Otherwise, all comments and opinions invited! > I think we should think a little about keeping LinuxCNC usable on very small screens, also, as there are some people who have need to use portable systems with smaller screens. Touchy does a good job of that, and I think can be functional down to 640 x 480 or something. Probably Axis can be set up to function on a smaller screen by adjusting font settings, too.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
