>>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:57:47 +0800, Yishin Li wrote: >>> >>>> IMHO, there's no technical limitations for implementing the spindle >>>> synchronization. The only problem would be finding out a contract >>>> to >>>> support our living while we were busy developing this feature. >>>> Well, I don't know this part of the code, but I don't see the real conflict. When in control of the motion system, meaning the G-code is explicitly commanding all aspects of the motion, then the S-curve should be in force. When in spindle-synchronized motion, all the trajectory planning stuff is on hold, and the spindle rotation programs the movement of the synchronized axis. So, the S-curve code of the trajectory planner would not be in control of the motion. This is the way it is done now, as far as I know.
What I'm trying to express above is that I can't see how Yishin's S-curve causes a fundamental conflict with the spindle sync. It may be that he cut this out of the code for expedience, of course. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
